are delayed at the refereeing stage as long as possible with the hopethat the author will give up. If this does not occur and they arepublished the second line of defence is to ignore them. If they give riseto some comment, the best approach is to argue simply that they arehopelessly wrong and then, if all else fails, an observer may bethreatened with loss of telescope time until he changes his program.[455]
the undercover economist epub 40
2ff7e9595c
Comments